Feature Requests

I’m a Framer Expert running a marketing agency with multiple long-term client sites on Framer. I don’t understand why agencies must transfer project ownership to retain free editor access. Our clients pay us monthly to manage and improve their sites, yet this model forces agencies to either lose operational control or pay significant recurring fees simply to do contracted work. This creates unnecessary friction for agencies and reduces the practical value of the Expert program. An agency-friendly model—such as persistent editor access for Experts or an agency workspace—would better reflect real-world workflows. I’m sharing this because we want to continue scaling Framer for client work, but the current structure makes that increasingly difficult. Kind regards,

See a clear list of all people who have access to each project Set roles per project, for example owner, admin, editor or viewer Why this is helpful This makes it easier to control who can see what, improves security for client projects and keeps permissions easier to manage when the team grows.

For small businesses and freelancers, the current pricing is very hard to justify. Taking one potential client example - their simple portfolio site that only needs light content updates ends up jumping from roughly $350 per year (current cost on Wix) to around $1,320 per year for 3 editors. That’s a huge increase for what is essentially light-touch content management. I’m struggling to understand how this pricing has been benchmarked against other platforms, many of which don’t impose such restrictive editor limits and are far more accommodating of freelancer and small business workflows. In reality for me, this unfortunately makes Framer a difficult recommendation for many of my clients who require more than one edit access, as they simply won’t commit to that level of investment for a brochure-style site. In addition, I feel the Framer pricing table is misleading (on framer.com/pricing ). It states that the Basic plan includes 2 seats “with edit access,” which I understood to mean that two users could edit the site on this plan. However, I’ve since been told this isn’t the case - that while two users can be added, you still have to pay separately for the second editor. I genuinely love the platform and would love to encourage more clients/prospects to switch to Framer - but unfortunately the pricing structure is a real blocker with small business conversations.

I think it's bad that they mix both payments instead of making it clear from the beginning that they are two different services and they try to charge me another $50 per month in subscription without leaving me an option to cancel easily. My website is already created and I just want to keep the hosting

We have marketers whose only role is to write content and update the CMS. Would be great if there was a role specifically for them so they can edit copy, but not actually edit anything else. BTW I think this should be a much cheaper seat than a full editor.

For example, the dates become 1 month for anything older than 30 days. Not ideal for finding specific dates.

Enable users to upload a self-made sitemap.xml file directly to the root as a well-known file.

Very obvious, the ability for users to create an account and access pages based on permission. (w/ API support from Payment services like Lemonsq/Stripe/Paypal..) This is a very needed feature with HIGH DEMAND from the community, it will unlock the ability to user framer sites for courses, digital product sales, Communities and subscription services. It's so high in demand that we got 3 companies who made their own authentication tool in answer for this need (Framer Auth.. Thenty..) although they are incomplete and locked for some countries because they rely solely on Lemon Squeezy and Stripe. And they're expensive to use even though they're incomplete and full of bandage-solutions. But this shows demand. Framer, this is important to you. This feature is what's stopping millions of websites that require these feature from being built on Framer. They go to your competitors. okay love you.

Being able to directly push changes for the browser in-editing, without going to the (web)app for publishing.

User suggested replacing error codes with more descriptive error messages and showing the exact component causing the issue. They also proposed extending error messages to warn users about faulty effects or when “section in view” effects have no section applied.